Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Akeneo PIM
Akeneo PIM clearly comes out ahead of Pimberly on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Akeneo PIM has a free tier; Pimberly does not. Pimberly's paid plans start at $3000/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | saas tool |
| Company | Akeneo | Pimberly |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | E-CommerceMarketingSales & CRM | E-CommerceMarketing |
| Categories | e-commerce | e-commerce |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Akeneo PIM
open source
custom
custom
flat
flat
flat
custom
| Feature | akeneo-pim | pimberly |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced Governance Tools | ||
| 100 Users | ||
| Advanced Rights Management | ||
| 100,000 Skus | ||
| Api Access | ||
| 10Tb Storage | ||
| Asset Manager | ||
| 20 Users | ||
| Catalog Management | ||
| 20Tb Storage | ||
| Core Product Information Management | ||
| 250,000 Skus | ||
| Data Export | ||
| 3Tb Storage | ||
| Enrichment Workflows | ||
| 50 Users | ||
| Managed Hosting | ||
| 50,000 Skus | ||
| Product Enrichment | ||
| Unlimited Currencies | ||
| Rules Engine | ||
| Unlimited Export Channels | ||
| Saas-Based | ||
| Unlimited Import Channels | ||
| Self-Hosted | ||
| Unlimited Multi-Brands | ||
| Sla Support | ||
| Unlimited Skus | ||
| Standardized Product Data Management | ||
| Unlimited Storage |
Showing 30 of 30 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Akeneo PIM comes out ahead overall, though Pimberly can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Akeneo PIM offers a free tier; Pimberly does not currently list one.
Akeneo PIM scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
Akeneo PIM is open source. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
