Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: TigerGraph
TigerGraph clearly comes out ahead of Amazon Neptune on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. TigerGraph has a free tier; Amazon Neptune does not.
| Overview |  Amazon NeptuneFast, reliable, fully managed graph database service by AWS. | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | saas tool | hybrid |
| Company | Amazon Web Services | TigerGraph |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | DevelopmentData & AnalyticsReal Estate & PropTech | DevelopmentData & Analytics |
| Categories | database | database |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
TigerGraph
usage based
freemium
custom
| Feature | amazon-neptune | tigergraph |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Year Term | ||
| 4 Tb Ram Per Workspace | ||
| Commitment To Specific Amount Of Usage | ||
| 99.95% Uptime | ||
| No Minimum Fees | ||
| Ai/Ml Library | ||
| No Upfront Commitments | ||
| Automatic And Rolling Upgrades | ||
| Automatic Backups | ||
| Enterprise Rbac & Security | ||
| Everything In Savanna | ||
| Everything In Savanna Free | ||
| Graph Algorithm Library | ||
| Gsql, Cypher, Gql | ||
| Gui-Based Design & Development | ||
| High Availability | ||
| Hybrid Graph & Vector Search | ||
| Multi-Zone For Enhanced Availability & Performance | ||
| Multiple R/W And Read-Only Workspaces | ||
| On-Demand Read Replicas | ||
| Premium Support | ||
| Private Cloud Deployment Available | ||
| Real-Time Deep Link Querying | ||
| Seamless Data Integration | ||
| Standard Support | ||
| Up To 512 Vcpus |
Showing 26 of 26 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, TigerGraph comes out ahead overall, though Amazon Neptune can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
TigerGraph offers a free tier; Amazon Neptune does not currently list one.
