Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Amundsen
Amundsen clearly comes out ahead of Secoda on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Amundsen has a free tier; Secoda does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | ai tool |
| Company | Teradata | Secoda |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | Data & AnalyticsDevelopment | Data & AnalyticsDevelopmentAI & Machine Learning |
| Categories | business-intelligence | business-intelligencedata-engineering |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Amundsen
open source
custom
custom
custom
custom
| Feature | amundsen | secoda |
|---|---|---|
| Apache License 2.0 | ||
| 3 Teams | ||
| Free To Customize | ||
| Access Request Management | ||
| Free To Download | ||
| Additional Integration Add-Ons | ||
| Free To Use | ||
| Ai Personas | ||
| Analytics | ||
| Api Access | ||
| Audit Logs | ||
| Automated Workflows | ||
| Collaboration Integrations | ||
| Custom Integrations | ||
| Custom User Roles | ||
| Data Catalog | ||
| Data Dictionary | ||
| Data Lineage | ||
| Data Monitoring And Observability | ||
| Data Quality Score | ||
| Data Requests | ||
| Disaster Recovery Support | ||
| Groups And Guest Accounts | ||
| Importing And Exporting | ||
| Pii Scanning | ||
| Premium Support | ||
| Productivity Extensions | ||
| Rbac | ||
| Saml | ||
| Scim |
Showing 30 of 30 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Amundsen comes out ahead overall, though Secoda can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Amundsen offers a free tier; Secoda does not currently list one.
Amundsen is open source. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
