Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Xano
Xano clearly comes out ahead of AppMaster on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Xano has a free tier; AppMaster does not. Paid plans start at $195/mo for AppMaster and $85/mo for Xano.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | hybrid |
| Company | AppMaster | Xano, Inc. |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | DevelopmentDesign | DevelopmentDesignSaaS & Cloud |
| Categories | no-code | databaseno-code |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Xano
flat
flat
flat
custom
freemium
flat
flat
custom
| Feature | appmaster | xano |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Max Installed Modules | ||
| 1 Workspace | ||
| 1000 Project Developers | ||
| 10 Total Team Seats | ||
| 10000 Max Installed Modules | ||
| 100 Gb Image And File Storage | ||
| 10000 Mobile Applications | ||
| 14-Day Rolling Backup | ||
| 10000 Web Applications | ||
| 24/7 Monitoring | ||
| 15 Max Installed Modules | ||
| 3 Total Workspaces | ||
| 2 Mobile Applications | ||
| 5 Total Team Seats | ||
| 2 Web Applications | ||
| 5 Total Workspaces | ||
| 3 Project Developers | ||
| 7-Day Rolling Backup | ||
| 3 Web Applications | ||
| 99.99% Sla | ||
| 5 Project Developers | ||
| Advanced Logging | ||
| 7 Max Installed Modules | ||
| Agent & Mcp Builder For Agentic Ai Workflows | ||
| Backend Binary Files | ||
| Automatic Backups | ||
| Backend Docker Images | ||
| Background Tasks | ||
| Backend Source Code | ||
| Branching And Merging |
Showing 30 of 30 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Xano comes out ahead overall, though AppMaster can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
AppMaster's paid plans start at $195/mo and Xano's start at $85/mo, so Xano is the lower entry price. Check the pricing comparison for higher tiers and per-seat costs.
Xano offers a free tier; AppMaster does not currently list one.
Xano scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
