Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Garden
Garden clearly comes out ahead of ArgoCD on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | hybrid |
| Company | Argo Project (CNCF) | Garden |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | DevelopmentSaaS & Cloud | DevelopmentSaaS & Cloud |
| Categories | devops | developer-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Garden
open source
open source
custom
| Feature | argocd | garden |
|---|---|---|
| Automated Application Synchronization | ||
| Advanced Ci/Cd Integration | ||
| Declarative Gitops Continuous Delivery | ||
| Build, Deploy, And Test Workflows | ||
| Kubernetes-Native | ||
| Development Automation For Kubernetes | ||
| Multi-Cluster Management | ||
| Everything In Open Source | ||
| Web-Based Ui | ||
| Managed Environment Management | ||
| Smart Caching | ||
| Sync Mode For Live Reloads | ||
| Team Collaboration Features |
Showing 13 of 13 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Garden comes out ahead overall, though ArgoCD can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both ArgoCD and Garden offer a free tier.
