Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Kuma
Kuma clearly comes out ahead of AWS App Mesh on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier.
| Overview |  AWS App MeshAWS managed service mesh for application-level networking. | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | saas tool | hybrid |
| Company | Amazon Web Services | Kong |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | Development | DevelopmentSaaS & Cloud |
| Categories | devops | devops |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Kuma
freemium
open source
custom
| Feature | aws-app-mesh | kuma |
|---|---|---|
| No Additional Charge For Using Aws App Mesh | ||
| Apache-2.0 License | ||
| Pay Only For Underlying Aws Resources (Ec2 Instances Or Fargate Cpu And Memory) Consumed By The Proxy | ||
| Enterprise-Grade Support | ||
| Free To Download And Use | ||
| Managed Services | ||
| Mission-Critical Features |
Showing 7 of 7 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Kuma comes out ahead overall, though AWS App Mesh can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both AWS App Mesh and Kuma offer a free tier.
Kuma is open source. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
