Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: BladePipe
BladePipe clearly comes out ahead of AWS Database Migration Service on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. BladePipe has a free tier; AWS Database Migration Service does not.
| Overview |  AWS Database Migration ServiceManaged database migration service for AWS cloud. | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | saas tool | saas tool |
| Company | BladePipe | Amazon Web Services (AWS) |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | DevelopmentData & Analytics | DevelopmentData & Analytics |
| Categories | database | database |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
BladePipe
open source
usage based
custom
usage based
usage based
usage based
| Feature | bladepipe | aws-database-migration-service |
|---|---|---|
| 50+ Datasources | ||
| 1-Year Term | ||
| 60+ Datasources | ||
| Commitment To Specific Amount Of Usage ($/Hour) | ||
| All Cloud Features | ||
| No Minimum Fees | ||
| All Community Features | ||
| No Upfront Commitments | ||
| Audit Logging | ||
| Pay By The Hour For Capacity Used | ||
| Cloud Support With Sla | ||
| Community Support | ||
| Ddl Synchronization | ||
| Enterprise Support With Sla | ||
| High Availability For Links | ||
| Lightweight Deployment And O&M | ||
| More Advanced Features | ||
| Multitenancy | ||
| No Need For Regular Activation | ||
| Real-Time Cdc | ||
| Role Granularity With Rbac | ||
| Schema Migration | ||
| Totally Self-Hosting In Your Own Vpc | ||
| Verification And Correction | ||
| Visualized, Custom Etl |
Showing 25 of 25 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, BladePipe comes out ahead overall, though AWS Database Migration Service can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
BladePipe offers a free tier; AWS Database Migration Service does not currently list one.
