Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Aws Lake Formation
AWS Lake Formation clearly comes out ahead of Google Cloud Dataplex on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. AWS Lake Formation has a free tier; Google Cloud Dataplex does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | saas tool | saas tool |
| Company | Amazon Web Services | |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | Data & AnalyticsDevelopmentEducation & EdTechLegal & ComplianceCybersecurity & InfoSecAI & Machine Learning | Data & AnalyticsDevelopmentLegal & Compliance |
| Categories | data-engineering | business-intelligence |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Aws Lake Formation
freemium
usage based
usage based
| Feature | aws-lake-formation | google-cloud-dataplex |
|---|---|---|
| Api Calls For Metadata | ||
| 0.060000 Per Dcu-Hour | ||
| Cell Level Permissions | ||
| 0.089000 Per Dcu-Hour | ||
| Column Level Permissions | ||
| 100 Dcu-Hours Free Allowance Per Month | ||
| Cross-Account Sharing | ||
| Automatic Discovery Of Table And Fileset Metadata | ||
| Data Filtering | ||
| Data Discovery Functionality | ||
| Data Scanning | ||
| Data Lineage | ||
| Database Level Permissions | ||
| Data Profiling | ||
| Metadata Tracking | ||
| Data Quality Checks | ||
| Name-Based Access Controls | ||
| Partition Pruning | ||
| Predicate Pushdown | ||
| Row Level Permissions | ||
| Storage Optimizer | ||
| Table Level Permissions | ||
| Tag-Based Access Controls |
Showing 23 of 23 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, AWS Lake Formation comes out ahead overall, though Google Cloud Dataplex can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
AWS Lake Formation offers a free tier; Google Cloud Dataplex does not currently list one.