Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Openobserve
OpenObserve clearly comes out ahead of Axiom on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier. Axiom's paid plans start at $25/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | hybrid |
| Company | Axiom.co | OpenObserve |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | DevelopmentSaaS & Cloud | DevelopmentSaaS & Cloud |
| Categories | observability-apm | observability-apm |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Openobserve
usage based
custom
| Feature | axiom | openobserve |
|---|---|---|
| Built-In Optimizations | ||
| Architecture Reviews | ||
| Core Capabilities | ||
| Community Support | ||
| Data Residency Options | ||
| Deployment Flexibility (Public Cloud, Or Bring Your Own Cloud) | ||
| Generous Allowances | ||
| Error Tracking | ||
| Global Regions | ||
| Extended Retention | ||
| Instant Setup | ||
| Full Observability Stack | ||
| On-Demand Scaling | ||
| Logs | ||
| Zero Infrastructure Management | ||
| Metrics | ||
| Premium Support | ||
| Rbac | ||
| Role-Based Access Control (Rbac) | ||
| Rum | ||
| Session Replay | ||
| Sso | ||
| Traces | ||
| Unlimited Users | ||
| Volume Discounts |
Showing 25 of 25 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, OpenObserve comes out ahead overall, though Axiom can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both Axiom and OpenObserve offer a free tier.
OpenObserve scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
OpenObserve is open source. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
