Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Turborepo and Buildkite score closely across Staquest's six weighted dimensions, with no decisive overall winner. Both offer a free tier. Buildkite's paid plans start at $30/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | saas tool | saas tool |
| Company | - | Buildkite |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | moderate | - |
| Integration | medium | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | Development | DevelopmentCybersecurity & InfoSecSales & CRMSaaS & Cloud |
| Categories | build-toolsdeveloper-tools | devops |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
open source
freemium
per user
custom
| Feature | turborepo | buildkite |
|---|---|---|
| Local And Ci Task Optimization | ||
| 1 Year Build Retention | ||
| Monorepo Workflow Management | ||
| 10 Concurrent Self-Hosted Agents Per Org/Mo | ||
| Remote Caching | ||
| 1Gb Storage & Bandwidth (Combined)/Mo | ||
| 2,000 Minutes/Month Hosted Agents | ||
| 20Gb Storage & Bandwidth (Combined) Per Org/Mo | ||
| 250 Managed Tests Per Org/Mo | ||
| 3 Concurrent Jobs (Hosted+Self-Hosted) Per Org/Mo | ||
| 500 Minutes/Month Hosted Agents | ||
| 50K Test Executions/Mo | ||
| 90 Days Build Retention | ||
| Advanced Governance & Control | ||
| Build Exports | ||
| Community Support | ||
| Custom Scim, Saml, Adfs | ||
| Github Enterprise Support | ||
| Job Retries Report | ||
| Pause Queues | ||
| Premium Support With Sla | ||
| Priority Email Support | ||
| Sso | ||
| Unlimited Pipelines | ||
| Unlimited Test Executions | ||
| User & Api Activity Audit Logs | ||
| Volume Discounts For Test Engine, Package Registries, And Hosted Agents | ||
| Waterfall View |
Showing 28 of 28 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
Both Turborepo and Buildkite offer a free tier.
Turborepo scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
Turborepo is open source, and Buildkite exposes a public API. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
