Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Screenapp
ScreenApp clearly comes out ahead of Cap on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. ScreenApp has a free tier; Cap does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | saas tool | saas tool |
| Company | Cap | ScreenApp |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | DesignMarketing | DesignMarketingAI & Machine Learning |
| Categories | ai-videodatabasevideo-conferencing | ai-video |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Screenapp
| Feature | cap | screenapp |
|---|---|---|
| Unlimited Editing | ||
| 3 Recordings | ||
| Unlimited Local Recording | ||
| Full Transcript Included | ||
| Try Ai Summaries, Chat, Templates |
Showing 5 of 5 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, ScreenApp comes out ahead overall, though Cap can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
ScreenApp offers a free tier; Cap does not currently list one.
Cap is open source, and ScreenApp exposes a public API. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
