Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: MLflow
MLflow clearly comes out ahead of Comet Opik on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier. Comet Opik's paid plans start at $19/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | ai tool | hybrid |
| Company | Comet | Databricks |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | DevelopmentData & AnalyticsAI & Machine LearningSaaS & Cloud | DevelopmentData & AnalyticsEducation & EdTechAI & Machine LearningSaaS & Cloud |
| Categories | ai-agents-frameworks | ai-agents-frameworks |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
MLflow
open source
freemium
flat
open source
| Feature | comet-opik | mlflow |
|---|---|---|
| Expanded Usage For Teams | ||
| Experiment Tracking | ||
| Extended Retention | ||
| Hyperparameter Tuning | ||
| Full Ai Engineering Featureset | ||
| Model Deployment | ||
| Full Feature Set | ||
| Model Registry | ||
| Managed Hosting | ||
| Model Versioning | ||
| No Feature Restrictions | ||
| Self-Hosted | ||
| Unlimited Spans |
Showing 13 of 13 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, MLflow comes out ahead overall, though Comet Opik can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both Comet Opik and MLflow offer a free tier.
MLflow scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
