Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Constant Contact
Constant Contact clearly comes out ahead of Keap on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Neither lists a free tier. Paid plans start at $12/mo for Constant Contact and $249/mo for Keap.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | hybrid |
| Company | Constant Contact | Keap |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | MarketingAI & Machine LearningMedia & Entertainment | MarketingData & AnalyticsFinTechSales & CRM |
| Categories | social-mediaemail-marketing | crmmarketing-automation |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Constant Contact
usage based
usage based
usage based
custom
| Feature | constant-contact | keap |
|---|---|---|
| 300+ Integrations | ||
| Crm | ||
| 500 Text Messages Per Month | ||
| Email Marketing | ||
| Advanced Reporting | ||
| Workflow Automation | ||
| Ai Writing Assistance | ||
| Custom Pricing Plans | ||
| Drag-And-Drop Email Editing | ||
| Email And Social Post Scheduling | ||
| Email Resending To Non-Openers | ||
| Everything In Lite | ||
| Everything In Standard | ||
| Lookalike Ad Targeting | ||
| Multi-Team/Department/Location Management | ||
| Seo Recommendations | ||
| Social Advertising | ||
| Social Posting | ||
| Three Automation Flows | ||
| Unlimited Automation | ||
| Unlimited Custom Segments | ||
| Welcome Series Automation |
Showing 22 of 22 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Constant Contact comes out ahead overall, though Keap can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Constant Contact's paid plans start at $12/mo and Keap's start at $249/mo, so Constant Contact is the lower entry price. Check the pricing comparison for higher tiers and per-seat costs.
Constant Contact scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
