Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Werf
Werf clearly comes out ahead of Cycloid on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Werf has a free tier; Cycloid does not. Cycloid's paid plans start at $29/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | hybrid |
| Company | Cycloid | Flant |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | DevelopmentLegal & ComplianceSaaS & Cloud | DevelopmentSaaS & Cloud |
| Categories | developer-tools | devops |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Werf
per user
per user
open source
| Feature | cycloid | werf |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Inventory | ||
| Build And Publish Container Images | ||
| Cloud Carbon Footprint | ||
| Deploy To Kubernetes | ||
| Cloud Cost Estimation | ||
| Full Application Lifecycle Management | ||
| Cloud Cost Management | ||
| Giterminism Support | ||
| Custom Notifications | ||
| Helm-Compatible Configuration | ||
| Custom Rbac | ||
| Event Tracking | ||
| Everything In Starter | ||
| Infraview | ||
| Multi-Organizations | ||
| Native Rbac | ||
| Notifications | ||
| Official Plugins | ||
| One Organization | ||
| Platform Orchestration | ||
| Saas | ||
| Saas Or Self-Hosted Version | ||
| Single Sign-On (Sso) | ||
| Stack | ||
| Stackforms | ||
| Support Open Hours (8Am-5Pm) |
Showing 26 of 26 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Werf comes out ahead overall, though Cycloid can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Werf offers a free tier; Cycloid does not currently list one.
Werf scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
Werf is open source. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
