Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: OpenEDR
OpenEDR clearly comes out ahead of Cynet 360 AutoXDR on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. OpenEDR has a free tier; Cynet 360 AutoXDR does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | saas tool | hybrid |
| Company | Cynet | Xcitium |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | DevelopmentCybersecurity & InfoSecMedia & Entertainment | DevelopmentCybersecurity & InfoSec |
| Categories | security-tools | security-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
OpenEDR
custom
open source
| Feature | cynet-360-autoxdr | openedr |
|---|---|---|
| 24/7 Cyops Mdr Service | ||
| Core Edr Capabilities | ||
| Automated Response (Soar) | ||
| Mitre Att&Ck Visibility | ||
| Deception Technology | ||
| Real-Time Threat Detection | ||
| Endpoint Detection And Response (Edr) | ||
| Root Cause Analysis | ||
| Endpoint Protection (Epp) | ||
| Self-Hosted Infrastructure Required | ||
| Network Detection And Response (Ndr) | ||
| User And Entity Behavior Analytics (Ueba) |
Showing 12 of 12 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, OpenEDR comes out ahead overall, though Cynet 360 AutoXDR can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
OpenEDR offers a free tier; Cynet 360 AutoXDR does not currently list one.
OpenEDR is open source. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
