Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: SQLMesh
SQLMesh clearly comes out ahead of Datafold on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier. Datafold's paid plans start at $600/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | hybrid |
| Company | Tobiko Data (Fivetran) | Datafold |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Active |
| Industries | Data & AnalyticsDevelopmentSaaS & Cloud | Data & AnalyticsDevelopmentSaaS & Cloud |
| Categories | data-engineering | data-observability |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
SQLMesh
open source
custom
freemium
flat
custom
| Feature | sqlmesh | datafold |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced Column-Level Impact Analysis | ||
| Advanced Lineage | ||
| Built-In Auditing | ||
| Ci/Cd Integration | ||
| Cloud Project Management | ||
| Column-Level Lineage | ||
| Compile-Time Sql Validation | ||
| Core Data Diff Features | ||
| Data Diffing | ||
| Custom Connectors | ||
| Fine-Grained Dependency Tracking | ||
| Dbt Integration | ||
| Managed Sqlmesh Service | ||
| Dedicated Support | ||
| Python Macros | ||
| Everything In Free | ||
| Secure Credential Handling | ||
| Everything In Team | ||
| Virtual Data Environments | ||
| Priority Support | ||
| Production Monitoring | ||
| Rbac | ||
| Sso / Saml | ||
| Unlimited Diffs | ||
| Vpc / Self-Hosted Deployment |
Showing 25 of 25 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, SQLMesh comes out ahead overall, though Datafold can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both SQLMesh and Datafold offer a free tier.
SQLMesh scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
SQLMesh is open source. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
