Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Deepseek
DeepSeek clearly comes out ahead of Zhihu Zhihai on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Zhihu Zhihai has a free tier; DeepSeek does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | ai tool | ai tool |
| Company | DeepSeek | Zhihu |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | DevelopmentData & AnalyticsAI & Machine LearningEducation & EdTech | Data & AnalyticsAI & Machine Learning |
| Categories | ai-foundation-modelsai-chatbot | ai-researchai-chatbot |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Deepseek
usage based
No pricing data available.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, DeepSeek comes out ahead overall, though Zhihu Zhihai can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Zhihu Zhihai offers a free tier; DeepSeek does not currently list one.
DeepSeek scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
DeepSeek is open source, and DeepSeek exposes a public API. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
