Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Readme
ReadMe clearly comes out ahead of Docusaurus on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier. ReadMe's paid plans start at $79/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | saas tool | saas tool |
| Company | Meta | ReadMe |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | Development | Development |
| Categories | developer-toolscustomer-successseo | developer-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Readme
open source
freemium
flat
flat
custom
| Feature | docusaurus | readme |
|---|---|---|
| Free For Personal And Commercial Use | ||
| Agent Owlbert | ||
| No Enterprise Tiers | ||
| Ai Doc Linting | ||
| No Feature Gates | ||
| Ai Dropdown | ||
| No Software Licensing Fees | ||
| Ai Features | ||
| Api Versions | ||
| Ask Ai Api Access | ||
| Audit Logs | ||
| Bidirectional Sync | ||
| Branching In Readme | ||
| Changelog | ||
| Css/Html | ||
| Custom Domain | ||
| Custom Javascript | ||
| Customizable Themes | ||
| Dedicated Support | ||
| Discussion Forum | ||
| Docs Audit Preview | ||
| Exclusive Ai Enhancements | ||
| Full Docs Audit With History | ||
| Global Component Library | ||
| Global Lint Rules | ||
| Global Reusable Content | ||
| Implementation Services | ||
| Interactive Api Reference | ||
| Landing Page | ||
| Llms.Txt |
Showing 30 of 30 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, ReadMe comes out ahead overall, though Docusaurus can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both Docusaurus and ReadMe offer a free tier.
Docusaurus is open source, and ReadMe exposes a public API. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
