Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code clearly comes out ahead of Double.bot on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier. Double.bot's paid plans start at $20/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | ai tool | hybrid |
| Company | Double | Microsoft |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | DevelopmentAI & Machine Learning | DevelopmentData & Analytics |
| Categories | ai-coding | developer-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Visual Studio Code
freemium
per user
open source
| Feature | doublebot | visual-studio-code |
|---|---|---|
| Autocomplete | ||
| Cross-Platform Support (Linux, Macos, Windows) | ||
| Chat | ||
| Debugging | ||
| Codesnap | ||
| Extensions | ||
| Custom Instructions | ||
| Integrated Git | ||
| Everything In Free | ||
| Inline Edit (Preview) | ||
| Key Bindings | ||
| Models | ||
| Unlimited Access For Power Users |
Showing 13 of 13 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Visual Studio Code comes out ahead overall, though Double.bot can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both Double.bot and Visual Studio Code offer a free tier.
Visual Studio Code scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
Visual Studio Code is open source, and Visual Studio Code exposes a public API. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
