Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: EasyOCR
EasyOCR clearly comes out ahead of olmOCR on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. EasyOCR has a free tier; olmOCR does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | ai tool | ai tool |
| Company | Jaided AI | Allen Institute for AI |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | DevelopmentData & Analytics | DevelopmentData & Analytics |
| Categories | ai-document-processing | ai-document-processing |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
EasyOCR
open source
custom
usage based
| Feature | easyocr | olmocr |
|---|---|---|
| 80+ Languages Support | ||
| Convert Into Text With A Natural Reading Order | ||
| Accuracy Improvement (>99%) | ||
| Efficient, Less Than $200 Usd Per Million Pages Converted | ||
| Custom Language Training | ||
| Handles Figures, Multi-Column Layouts, And Insets | ||
| Deep Learning Models (Craft/Crnn) | ||
| Layout And Table Recognition | ||
| On-Premise Or Api/Cloud Solution | ||
| Optimization For Cpu/Gpu/Mobile/Embedded | ||
| Python Library | ||
| Self-Hosted | ||
| Semi-Automated Labeling Tool | ||
| Signature Detection/Comparison | ||
| Tailor-Made Plan |
Showing 15 of 15 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, EasyOCR comes out ahead overall, though olmOCR can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
EasyOCR offers a free tier; olmOCR does not currently list one.
