Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Thunkable
Thunkable clearly comes out ahead of Fliplet on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier. Thunkable's paid plans start at $19/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | saas tool | saas tool |
| Company | Fliplet | Thunkable, Inc. |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | DevelopmentDesign | DevelopmentDesign |
| Categories | no-code | no-code |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Thunkable
freemium
usage based
usage based
flat
flat
flat
custom
| Feature | fliplet | thunkable |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Fliplet Studio User Per App | ||
| 1 Live Published App | ||
| 50 Data Sources | ||
| 1 Private Project | ||
| Advanced Integrations | ||
| 10 Private Projects | ||
| Advanced Security Features | ||
| 10 Screens Per Project | ||
| Build And Launch Web Apps | ||
| 100,000 Ai Tokens | ||
| Controlled App Access | ||
| 2,000 Ai Tokens | ||
| Limited App Access | ||
| 20,000 Ai Tokens | ||
| Standard Features | ||
| 3 Public Projects | ||
| Unlimited Storage | ||
| 5 Public Projects | ||
| Web, Ios, And Android Apps | ||
| 5 Screens Per Project | ||
| 50,000 Ai Tokens | ||
| Chat Support | ||
| Custom Branding | ||
| Intercom Support | ||
| Priority Support | ||
| ∞ Live Published Apps | ||
| ∞ Private Projects | ||
| ∞ Public Projects | ||
| ∞ Screens Per Project |
Showing 29 of 29 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Thunkable comes out ahead overall, though Fliplet can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both Fliplet and Thunkable offer a free tier.
Thunkable scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
