Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Visual Studio Code and GitHub Codespaces score closely across Staquest's six weighted dimensions, with no decisive overall winner. Both offer a free tier.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | saas tool |
| Company | Microsoft | GitHub (Microsoft) |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | DevelopmentData & Analytics | Development |
| Categories | developer-tools | developer-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
open source
| Feature | visual-studio-code | github-codespaces |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-Platform Support (Linux, Macos, Windows) | ||
| 120 Core-Hours Compute | ||
| Debugging | ||
| 15 Gb Storage | ||
| Extensions | ||
| 180 Core-Hours Compute | ||
| Integrated Git | ||
| 20 Gb Storage | ||
| No Free Usage Quota |
Showing 9 of 9 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
Both Visual Studio Code and GitHub Codespaces offer a free tier.
Visual Studio Code is open source. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
