Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: GitHub Advanced Security
GitHub Advanced Security clearly comes out ahead of GitHub on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier. GitHub's paid plans start at $4/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | saas tool |
| Company | - | GitHub (Microsoft) |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | moderate | - |
| Integration | low | - |
| Trending | Active | Stable |
| Industries | DevelopmentSaaS & Cloud | DevelopmentCybersecurity & InfoSec |
| Categories | developer-toolsdevops | security-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
GitHub Advanced Security
open source
custom
| Feature | github | github-advanced-security |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced Collaboration | ||
| Code Scanning | ||
| Advanced Security | ||
| Custom Auto-Triage Rules | ||
| Compliance | ||
| Dependency Review | ||
| Dedicated Support | ||
| Secret Scanning | ||
| Essential Development Tools | ||
| Security Overview | ||
| Increased Ci/Cd Capacity | ||
| Protected Branches | ||
| Saml Sso |
Showing 13 of 13 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, GitHub Advanced Security comes out ahead overall, though GitHub can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both GitHub and GitHub Advanced Security offer a free tier.
GitHub Advanced Security scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
