Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Google Postmaster Tools
Google Postmaster Tools clearly comes out ahead of Postmark on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier. Postmark's paid plans start at $15/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | saas tool | saas tool |
| Company | ActiveCampaign | |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | MarketingCybersecurity & InfoSecSaaS & Cloud | Marketing |
| Categories | email-marketing | email-marketing |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Google Postmaster Tools
freemium
freemium
usage based
usage based
usage based
| Feature | google-postmaster-tools | postmark |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance Status Dashboard | ||
| 10 Custom Sending Domains | ||
| Delivery Error Tracking | ||
| 100 Emails/Month | ||
| Domain Reputation Tracking | ||
| 45-Day Data Retention | ||
| Email Authentication Monitoring (Spf, Dkim, Dmarc) | ||
| 5 Custom Sending Domains | ||
| Email Encryption Insights | ||
| Customizable Data Retention Up To 365 Days | ||
| Feedback Loop (Fbl) Data | ||
| Detailed Analytics And Insights | ||
| Ip Reputation Tracking | ||
| Evaluating Postmark'S Deliverability | ||
| Spam Rate Monitoring | ||
| Inbound Email Processing | ||
| Industry-Leading Deliverability Rates & Speed | ||
| Side Projects With Low Volume | ||
| Test Your Integration | ||
| Unlimited Custom Sending Domains | ||
| Unlimited Emails/Day |
Showing 21 of 21 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Google Postmaster Tools comes out ahead overall, though Postmark can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both Google Postmaster Tools and Postmark offer a free tier.
Google Postmaster Tools scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
