Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Grafana Tempo
Grafana Tempo clearly comes out ahead of Kloudfuse on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Grafana Tempo has a free tier; Kloudfuse does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | hybrid |
| Company | Kloudfuse | Grafana Labs |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | DevelopmentSaaS & Cloud | Development |
| Categories | observability-apm | observability-apm |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Grafana Tempo
custom
open source
freemium
usage based
custom
| Feature | kloudfuse | grafana-tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Ai/Ml Anomaly Detection | ||
| 10K Active Series Metrics | ||
| Flat Pricing Model | ||
| 14-Day Retention | ||
| Log Fingerprinting | ||
| 3 Active Users | ||
| No Egress Fees | ||
| 50Gb Logs | ||
| No Overage Fees | ||
| 50Gb Traces | ||
| No Per-User Pricing | ||
| 8X5 Email Support | ||
| Unified Observability Data Lake | ||
| 99.5% Uptime Sla | ||
| Vpc Deployment | ||
| Advanced Security Features (Saml, Ldap) | ||
| Compatible With Jaeger, Zipkin, And Opentelemetry | ||
| Compliance Adherence (E.G., Federal Cloud) | ||
| Custom Retention | ||
| Dedicated Support | ||
| Deep Integration With Grafana, Prometheus, And Loki | ||
| High-Scale Distributed Tracing Backend | ||
| Object Storage Dependency | ||
| Pay-As-You-Go Usage | ||
| Traces: ~$0.50 Per Gb Ingested |
Showing 25 of 25 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Grafana Tempo comes out ahead overall, though Kloudfuse can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Grafana Tempo offers a free tier; Kloudfuse does not currently list one.
Grafana Tempo is open source. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
