Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: HoneyHive
HoneyHive clearly comes out ahead of LangSmith on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier. LangSmith's paid plans start at $39/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | ai tool | ai tool |
| Company | HoneyHive | LangChain Inc. |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | DevelopmentMarketingSaaS & Cloud | DevelopmentMarketingAI & Machine LearningSaaS & Cloud |
| Categories | ai-chatbotai-agents-frameworks | observability-apmai-chatbotai-agents-frameworks |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
HoneyHive
freemium
custom
freemium
per seat
custom
| Feature | honeyhive | langsmith |
|---|---|---|
| Dedicated Support | ||
| Access To Core Platform Features For Individual Developers | ||
| 1 Free Dev-Sized Deployment | ||
| Enterprise-Grade Hosting Options | ||
| 1 Seat | ||
| Higher Usage Limits | ||
| 10,000 Base Traces/Month Included Per Seat | ||
| Powerful Capabilities For Scaling Teams | ||
| 5,000 Base Traces/Month Included | ||
| Self-Hosting | ||
| Access To Langsmith (Tracing, Evaluation, Prompt Hub, Playground, Canvas, Annotation Queues) | ||
| Advanced Administration And Authentication | ||
| Annual Invoicing Options | ||
| Collaboration Features (Multiple Workspaces) | ||
| Custom Deployment Options (Including Byoc And Self-Hosting) | ||
| Enhanced Rate Limits And Throughput | ||
| Includes All Developer Features | ||
| Unlimited Seats |
Showing 18 of 18 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, HoneyHive comes out ahead overall, though LangSmith can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both HoneyHive and LangSmith offer a free tier.
HoneyHive scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
