Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Hound
Hound clearly comes out ahead of Sourcegraph on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier. Sourcegraph's paid plans start at $9/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | hybrid |
| Company | Etsy | Sourcegraph |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | Development | DevelopmentData & Analytics |
| Categories | developer-tools | ai-codingdeveloper-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Hound
open source
per user
custom
| Feature | hound | sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Docker Deployment | ||
| Ability To Use Sourcegraph Platform To Provide Full Codebase Context | ||
| Self-Hosted | ||
| Basic Context | ||
| Code Assistant Capabilities | ||
| Cross-Repository Code Search And Understanding | ||
| Enterprise-Grade Admin And Security Features | ||
| Flexible Llm Options (Including The Ability To Bring Your Own Llm Api Key) | ||
| Full Codebase Context | ||
| Inline Code Editing And Generation | ||
| Multi-Model Support (E.G., Claude, Gpt-4, Gemini) | ||
| Options For 24X5 Support, Dedicated Customer Success Manager (Csm), And Premium Support Offerings | ||
| Remote Codebase Context (All Code Hosts) | ||
| Unlimited Usage And Context For Larger Local Codebases |
Showing 14 of 14 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Hound comes out ahead overall, though Sourcegraph can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both Hound and Sourcegraph offer a free tier.
Hound scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
Hound is open source. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
