Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Qbiq
qbiq clearly comes out ahead of Interior AI on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Neither lists a free tier. Interior AI's paid plans start at $60/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | saas tool | ai tool |
| Company | qbiq | Interior AI |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | DesignReal Estate & PropTechAI & Machine Learning | DesignReal Estate & PropTechAI & Machine Learning |
| Categories | ai-3d | ai-3d |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Qbiq
custom
flat
| Feature | qbiq | interior-ai |
|---|---|---|
| Ai-Enabled Architectural Planning | ||
| 5,000 Interiors/Mo | ||
| Data Analysis | ||
| Lightning Fast Response Times | ||
| Floor Plans | ||
| Priority Access | ||
| Quantity Takeoffs | ||
| Rendered Images | ||
| Revit/Cad Models | ||
| Virtual Tours |
Showing 10 of 10 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, qbiq comes out ahead overall, though Interior AI can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
qbiq scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
