Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: ITK-SNAP
ITK-SNAP clearly comes out ahead of Labellerr on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier. Labellerr's paid plans start at $499/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | ai tool | saas tool |
| Company | ITK-SNAP Developers | Tensorgraph |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | HealthcareData & Analytics | HealthcareData & AnalyticsEducation & EdTechAI & Machine Learning |
| Categories | healthcare-tools | healthcare-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
ITK-SNAP
open source
freemium
per seat
custom
| Feature | itk-snap | labellerr |
|---|---|---|
| 3D And 4D Biomedical Image Segmentation | ||
| 1 Seat | ||
| Cross-Platform Support (Windows, Macos, Linux) | ||
| 1 Workspace | ||
| Linked Cursor For 3D Navigation | ||
| 10 Seats | ||
| Manual Delineation And Image Navigation | ||
| 100 Projects | ||
| Semi-Automatic Segmentation Using Active Contour Methods | ||
| 2,500 Files | ||
| Support For Nifti, Dicom, And Other Formats | ||
| 50,000 Data Credits | ||
| Advanced Automation Features (Sam, Sam 2, Active Learning, And Model-Assisted Labeling) | ||
| All Data Type Support | ||
| Enterprise Sla & Support | ||
| Human In The Loop Services | ||
| Multiple Workspaces | ||
| Private Cloud & On-Premise | ||
| Single Sign-On (Sso) | ||
| Unlimited Data Credits And Seats | ||
| Unlimited Projects |
Showing 21 of 21 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, ITK-SNAP comes out ahead overall, though Labellerr can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both ITK-SNAP and Labellerr offer a free tier.
ITK-SNAP scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
ITK-SNAP is open source. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
