Kodjin vs MedeAnalytics

Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions

Winner: Kodjin

Kodjin clearly comes out ahead of MedeAnalytics on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Neither lists a free tier.

Quick Overview

Overview	KodjinFHIR-native data platform for healthcare interoperability.	MedeAnalyticsEnterprise healthcare analytics for payers and providers.
Type	saas tool	saas tool
Company	Edenlab	MedeAnalytics
Free Tier
Has API
Open Source
Trending	Stable	Stable
Industries	HealthcareData & Analytics	HealthcareData & Analytics
Categories	healthcare-tools	healthcare-toolsanalytics
Website	Visit	Visit

Dimension Scores

Winners by Dimension

Overall Winner

Kodjin

Kodjin: 6.3MedeAnalytics: 5.9(+0.5 pts)

Pricing Value

Tie15% weight

Kodjin

8.0

MedeAnalytics

8.0

Free Tier

Tie10% weight

Kodjin

2.0

MedeAnalytics

2.0

Scalability

Tie10% weight

Kodjin

7.8

MedeAnalytics

7.8

Integrations

Tie10% weight

Kodjin

8.0

MedeAnalytics

8.0

Community

Tie5% weight

Kodjin

3.0

MedeAnalytics

3.0

Open Source

Kodjin5% weight

Kodjin

7.0

MedeAnalytics

2.0

Pricing Comparison

Kodjin

Enterprise

Contact sales

custom

Enterprise FHIR R4 server
High-throughput capabilities
Custom FHIR profiling
National-scale health data platform deployment
API management
FHIR data access layer implementation

MedeAnalytics

Enterprise

Contact sales

custom

Frequently asked questions

Is Kodjin or MedeAnalytics better?

On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Kodjin comes out ahead overall, though MedeAnalytics can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.

What are the main differences between Kodjin and MedeAnalytics?

Kodjin is open source. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.

View Kodjin View MedeAnalytics