Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Kuma
Kuma clearly comes out ahead of Tetrate Service Bridge on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Kuma has a free tier; Tetrate Service Bridge does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | hybrid |
| Company | Tetrate | Kong |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | DevelopmentLegal & Compliance | DevelopmentSaaS & Cloud |
| Categories | devops | devops |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Kuma
custom
open source
custom
| Feature | tetrate-service-bridge | kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise-Grade Security And Compliance | ||
| Apache-2.0 License | ||
| Hardened And Vetted Data-Plane And Control-Plane Binaries | ||
| Enterprise-Grade Support | ||
| Support For Modern And Legacy Workloads | ||
| Free To Download And Use | ||
| Traffic Management And Observability | ||
| Managed Services | ||
| Unified Management Plane For Multi-Cluster And Multi-Cloud | ||
| Mission-Critical Features |
Showing 10 of 10 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Kuma comes out ahead overall, though Tetrate Service Bridge can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Kuma offers a free tier; Tetrate Service Bridge does not currently list one.
Kuma is open source. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
