Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: LoadRunner
LoadRunner clearly comes out ahead of LoadNinja on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. LoadRunner has a free tier; LoadNinja does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | saas tool |
| Company | OpenText | SmartBear Software |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | Development | Development |
| Categories | testing-tools | testing-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
LoadRunner
freemium
custom
custom
| Feature | loadrunner | loadninja |
|---|---|---|
| 50 Concurrent Virtual Users | ||
| 25 Load Testing Hours | ||
| Advanced Protocol Support | ||
| 250 Virtual Users | ||
| Ci/Cd Integration | ||
| Add Unlimited Team Members | ||
| Collaboration Tools | ||
| Test Any Number Of Virtual Users | ||
| Enterprise-Scale Load Testing | ||
| Test For Moderate To High Traffic | ||
| Performance Testing | ||
| Protocol Support |
Showing 12 of 12 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, LoadRunner comes out ahead overall, though LoadNinja can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
LoadRunner offers a free tier; LoadNinja does not currently list one.
