Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Octoperf
OctoPerf clearly comes out ahead of LoadNinja on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. OctoPerf has a free tier; LoadNinja does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | saas tool | hybrid |
| Company | SmartBear Software | OctoPerf |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | Development | Development |
| Categories | testing-tools | testing-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Octoperf
custom
freemium
usage based
custom
| Feature | loadninja | octoperf |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Load Testing Hours | ||
| 1,000 To 5,000+ Concurrent Users Options | ||
| 250 Virtual Users | ||
| Access All Saas Platform Features | ||
| Add Unlimited Team Members | ||
| Dedicated Account Manager | ||
| Test Any Number Of Virtual Users | ||
| Dedicated Demo | ||
| Test For Moderate To High Traffic | ||
| Free Workshop | ||
| Full On-Premise Infrastructure | ||
| Max Testing Duration Of 20 Minutes | ||
| No Subscription Required | ||
| On-Premise Injection On Saas | ||
| Pay Only For The Test Hours You Use | ||
| Up To 50 Concurrent Users |
Showing 16 of 16 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, OctoPerf comes out ahead overall, though LoadNinja can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
OctoPerf offers a free tier; LoadNinja does not currently list one.
