Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: LoadRunner
LoadRunner clearly comes out ahead of NeoLoad on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. LoadRunner has a free tier; NeoLoad does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | ai tool |
| Company | OpenText | Tricentis |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | Development | DevelopmentAI & Machine LearningSaaS & Cloud |
| Categories | testing-tools | testing-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
LoadRunner
freemium
custom
custom
| Feature | loadrunner | neoload |
|---|---|---|
| 50 Concurrent Virtual Users | ||
| Ci/Cd Pipeline Integration | ||
| Advanced Protocol Support | ||
| Codeless Test Design | ||
| Ci/Cd Integration | ||
| Performance And Load Testing For Web, Mobile, And Enterprise Applications | ||
| Collaboration Tools | ||
| Real-Time Analytics And Reporting | ||
| Enterprise-Scale Load Testing | ||
| Support For Complex Protocols And Technologies | ||
| Performance Testing | ||
| Protocol Support |
Showing 12 of 12 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, LoadRunner comes out ahead overall, though NeoLoad can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
LoadRunner offers a free tier; NeoLoad does not currently list one.
