Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: LoadRunner
LoadRunner clearly comes out ahead of Tricentis NeoLoad on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. LoadRunner has a free tier; Tricentis NeoLoad does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | ai tool |
| Company | OpenText | Tricentis |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | Development | DevelopmentAI & Machine LearningSaaS & Cloud |
| Categories | testing-tools | testing-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
LoadRunner
freemium
custom
flat
| Feature | loadrunner | tricentis-neoload |
|---|---|---|
| 50 Concurrent Virtual Users | ||
| Bridge The Gap Between Entry-Level Testers And Experts | ||
| Advanced Protocol Support | ||
| Define Goals, Analyze Results, And Prevent Performance Problems | ||
| Ci/Cd Integration | ||
| Ensure Consistent Quality Across All Releases | ||
| Collaboration Tools | ||
| Increase Productivity | ||
| Enterprise-Scale Load Testing | ||
| Scale Your Load Testing Approach Across Different Teams | ||
| Performance Testing | ||
| Standardize On A Single Platform | ||
| Protocol Support |
Showing 13 of 13 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, LoadRunner comes out ahead overall, though Tricentis NeoLoad can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
LoadRunner offers a free tier; Tricentis NeoLoad does not currently list one.
LoadRunner scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
