Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: LoadRunner
LoadRunner clearly comes out ahead of Tricentis Tosca on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. LoadRunner has a free tier; Tricentis Tosca does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | hybrid |
| Company | Tricentis | OpenText |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | Development | Development |
| Categories | testing-tools | testing-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
LoadRunner
custom
freemium
custom
| Feature | tricentis-tosca | loadrunner |
|---|---|---|
| Api, Mobile, And Ui Testing | ||
| 50 Concurrent Virtual Users | ||
| Codeless, Model-Based Test Automation | ||
| Advanced Protocol Support | ||
| End-To-End Test Automation | ||
| Ci/Cd Integration | ||
| Integration With Devops Pipelines | ||
| Collaboration Tools | ||
| Support For 160+ Technologies | ||
| Enterprise-Scale Load Testing | ||
| Performance Testing | ||
| Protocol Support |
Showing 12 of 12 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, LoadRunner comes out ahead overall, though Tricentis Tosca can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
LoadRunner offers a free tier; Tricentis Tosca does not currently list one.
