Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Microsoft Teams for Education
Microsoft Teams for Education clearly comes out ahead of Vedamo on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier. Vedamo's paid plans start at $25/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | saas tool | saas tool |
| Company | Microsoft | Vedamo EAD |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | Education & EdTechDevelopment | Education & EdTechDevelopment |
| Categories | edtech-lmsvideo-conferencing | edtech-lms |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Microsoft Teams for Education
freemium
custom
custom
freemium
per seat
custom
| Feature | microsoft-teams-for-education | vedamo |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced Management Tools | ||
| 1 Participant Per Session | ||
| Advanced Security | ||
| 1 Virtual Classroom | ||
| Analytics Systems | ||
| 30-Day Trial Access To Full Toolset | ||
| Assignments | ||
| 5 Gb Initial File Storage | ||
| Class Materials | ||
| Cloud-Based File Library | ||
| Compliance | ||
| Custom Branding | ||
| Everything In A1 | ||
| Customized Lms And Virtual Classroom Configurations | ||
| Everything In A3 | ||
| Dedicated Support | ||
| Full Access To The Office Desktop Apps | ||
| Interactive Session Recordings | ||
| Increased Security | ||
| Multi-User Management | ||
| Live Events | ||
| Scalable Storage | ||
| Microsoft Bookings | ||
| Up To 50 Participants Per Session | ||
| Real-Time Collaboration | ||
| Unified Communication Tools | ||
| Video Conferencing | ||
| Web Versions Of Microsoft Teams, Word, Excel, Powerpoint, Onenote, And Outlook |
Showing 28 of 28 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Microsoft Teams for Education comes out ahead overall, though Vedamo can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both Microsoft Teams for Education and Vedamo offer a free tier.
Microsoft Teams for Education scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
