Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: OctoPerf
OctoPerf clearly comes out ahead of Zephyr Scale on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. OctoPerf has a free tier; Zephyr Scale does not. Zephyr Scale's paid plans start at $10/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | saas tool |
| Company | OctoPerf | SmartBear Software |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | Development | Development |
| Categories | testing-tools | testing-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
OctoPerf
freemium
usage based
custom
per user
per user
| Feature | octoperf | zephyr-scale |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 To 5,000+ Concurrent Users Options | ||
| Bdd Support | ||
| Access All Saas Platform Features | ||
| Cross-Browser Testing | ||
| Dedicated Account Manager | ||
| Cross-Project Reporting And Traceability | ||
| Dedicated Demo | ||
| Email And Sms Testing | ||
| Free Workshop | ||
| Everything From Standard | ||
| Full On-Premise Infrastructure | ||
| Integration With Automation And Ci/Cd | ||
| Max Testing Duration Of 20 Minutes | ||
| No-Code Test Automation (Expanded) | ||
| No Subscription Required | ||
| Parallel Testing | ||
| On-Premise Injection On Saas | ||
| Rest Api | ||
| Pay Only For The Test Hours You Use | ||
| Test Case Management And Execution | ||
| Up To 50 Concurrent Users |
Showing 21 of 21 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, OctoPerf comes out ahead overall, though Zephyr Scale can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
OctoPerf offers a free tier; Zephyr Scale does not currently list one.
OctoPerf scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
