Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Tesseract Ocr
Tesseract OCR clearly comes out ahead of olmOCR on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Tesseract OCR has a free tier; olmOCR does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | ai tool | ai tool |
| Company | Tesseract OCR Project | Allen Institute for AI |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | DevelopmentData & Analytics | DevelopmentData & Analytics |
| Categories | ai-document-processing | ai-document-processing |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Tesseract Ocr
open source
usage based
| Feature | tesseract-ocr | olmocr |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution | ||
| Convert Into Text With A Natural Reading Order | ||
| Free Use | ||
| Efficient, Less Than $200 Usd Per Million Pages Converted | ||
| Modification | ||
| Handles Figures, Multi-Column Layouts, And Insets |
Showing 6 of 6 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Tesseract OCR comes out ahead overall, though olmOCR can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Tesseract OCR offers a free tier; olmOCR does not currently list one.
