Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
OpenZiti and Pomerium score closely across Staquest's six weighted dimensions, with no decisive overall winner. Both offer a free tier.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | hybrid |
| Company | NetFoundry | Pomerium, Inc. |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | DevelopmentCybersecurity & InfoSec | DevelopmentCybersecurity & InfoSecLegal & Compliance |
| Categories | security-tools | security-tools |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
open source
custom
open source
custom
| Feature | openziti | pomerium |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Hosted | ||
| Apache 2.0 License | ||
| Advanced Authorization Policies | ||
| Controllers, Routers, Tunnelers, And Sdks | ||
| Clientless Access | ||
| Enterprise Support (24X7) | ||
| Context-Aware Access Control | ||
| Full Core Networking Functionality | ||
| Enterprise Integrations | ||
| Fully Managed, Globally Distributed Network | ||
| Identity-Aware Access Proxy | ||
| On-Premises And Air-Gapped Options | ||
| Managed Control Plane | ||
| Private, Customer-Dedicated Overlays | ||
| Support Slas | ||
| Slas (Up To 99.95%) |
Showing 16 of 16 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
Both OpenZiti and Pomerium offer a free tier.
