Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: TigerGraph
TigerGraph clearly comes out ahead of PuppyGraph on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Both offer a free tier.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | hybrid |
| Company | TigerGraph | PuppyGraph |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | DevelopmentData & Analytics | DevelopmentData & Analytics |
| Categories | database | database |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
TigerGraph
usage based
freemium
custom
freemium
usage based
| Feature | tigergraph | puppygraph |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Tb Ram Per Workspace | ||
| Advanced Visualization | ||
| 99.95% Uptime | ||
| Basic Visualization | ||
| Ai/Ml Library | ||
| Dedicated Support | ||
| Automatic And Rolling Upgrades | ||
| Docker-Based Deployment | ||
| Automatic Backups | ||
| Multi-Instance Clustering | ||
| Enterprise Rbac & Security | ||
| Single-Node | ||
| Everything In Savanna | ||
| Sso | ||
| Everything In Savanna Free | ||
| Up To 2 Data Sources | ||
| Graph Algorithm Library | ||
| Gsql, Cypher, Gql | ||
| Gui-Based Design & Development | ||
| High Availability | ||
| Hybrid Graph & Vector Search | ||
| Multi-Zone For Enhanced Availability & Performance | ||
| Multiple R/W And Read-Only Workspaces | ||
| On-Demand Read Replicas | ||
| Premium Support | ||
| Private Cloud Deployment Available | ||
| Real-Time Deep Link Querying | ||
| Seamless Data Integration | ||
| Standard Support | ||
| Up To 512 Vcpus |
Showing 30 of 30 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, TigerGraph comes out ahead overall, though PuppyGraph can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Both TigerGraph and PuppyGraph offer a free tier.
