Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Winner: Traefik Mesh
Traefik Mesh clearly comes out ahead of Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh on Staquest's weighted six-dimension score. Traefik Mesh has a free tier; Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh does not.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | hybrid | hybrid |
| Company | Red Hat | Traefik Labs |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| Industries | Development | DevelopmentSaaS & Cloud |
| Categories | devops | devops |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
Traefik Mesh
custom
custom
open source
| Feature | red-hat-openshift-service-mesh | traefik-mesh |
|---|---|---|
| Included As A Component Of The Platform | ||
| Compatibility | ||
| Red Hat Openshift Service Mesh | ||
| Easy Installation | ||
| Non-Invasive | ||
| Observability | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Security | ||
| Traffic Management |
Showing 9 of 9 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
On Staquest's weighted six-dimension scoring, Traefik Mesh comes out ahead overall, though Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh can be the better fit depending on your priorities — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown above.
Traefik Mesh offers a free tier; Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh does not currently list one.
