Detailed comparison across 10 dimensions
Serposcope and Wincher score closely across Staquest's six weighted dimensions, with no decisive overall winner. Serposcope has a free tier; Wincher does not. Wincher's paid plans start at $49/mo.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | saas tool | saas tool |
| Company | Serphacker | Wincher AB |
| Free Tier | ||
| Has API | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Learning Curve | - | - |
| Integration | - | - |
| Trending | Stable | Stable |
| GitHub Stars | - | - |
| Industries | MarketingData & AnalyticsSaaS & Cloud | MarketingData & Analytics |
| Categories | seo | seo |
| Website | Visit | Visit |
open source
| Feature | serposcope | wincher |
|---|---|---|
| Customizable Search Parameters | ||
| 1 User | ||
| Historical Rank Monitoring | ||
| 1000 Keywords | ||
| Local Search Tracking | ||
| 500 Keywords | ||
| Proxy And Captcha Support | ||
| 5000 Keywords | ||
| Unlimited Keyword Tracking | ||
| Multiple Users | ||
| Unlimited Website Tracking | ||
| Unlimited Websites | ||
| User And Group Management | ||
| Up To 10 Websites |
Showing 14 of 14 features
Dashes mean the feature isn't listed in our data. The tool may still support it.
Serposcope offers a free tier; Wincher does not currently list one.
Wincher scores higher on pricing value in Staquest's analysis. It is the highest-weighted dimension in this comparison.
Serposcope is open source, and Wincher exposes a public API. The feature comparison and dimension scores above cover the full breakdown.
